November 13, 2024
We need to make clear, that at the time of writing, there are no ISO or EN standards which deal with the sampling of groundwater for PFAS.
There is a vast library of scientific papers which describe the challenges and methodologies related to this subject and whereas we are certainly not in a position to debunk or even query these writings, we do need to point out that there is a diversity of opinions which are often confusing and sometimes contradictory. Frequently, we detect an unjustifiable emphasis on minutiae, drilling down on potential pathways for contamination which some papers are, off and on, forcefully querying.
There also seems to be a divergence between European and American pragmatism. The latter concentrate on pathways of contamination from the field technician and materials used which could lead to an over-estimation of PFAS; the Europeans tag on to that the possible understatement due to PFAS sorbing into the sampling materials. It is not for us to comment on the validity of either approach.
Our suggestions and comments, which could change without notice as we progress with this subject, are as follows:
Vincent van Walt
13th November 2024
Validity November 2024
Revision 5.0 – 13th November 2024
Environmental monitoring has developed considerably over the years. From the time when a consultant went out monthly or quarterly with a dip tape to monitor the groundwater level in a borehole, wind forward...
Read MoreThe interest in Nitrates is nothing new. One way or another we have been measuring them for half a century.
Read MoreA client recently contacted me to ask if we can repair their high flow purge pump and or sell then a new one. They were using it for (among other applications) to purge a 70m deep bore 3 times for a...
Read MoreA small selection of our environmental equipment